I totally agree with Paul,
I totally agree with Paul, who has said it best. But to me, most jewelry seems to exist for the purpose of being a piece of jewelry while it’s easier for me to see a larger piece of glass, designed to test the possibiities of the medium and the imagination of the artist, as “art”. But then I would also have to agree that size should not be the determining factor. ??
However, if you look at Paul’s work or that of Steve Immerman, I don’t think there’s any confusing that as “craft”. Perhaps a better question is why we connote different status to each category, when shouldn’t ‘craft’ just be a subcategory of ‘art’ ?
Windows listen attentively for the sound of broken glass.